I wrote this in response to one of the unrealistic and immature articles by Tasleema Nasreen. Though I’m not expecting her to approve my comment but want to make her realize that she needs to come up with investigated, verified and credible stuff. Here is the link of her article against which I posted a comment.
“What do you know about Mut’ah?
In Wahabism Muta’ah is not allowed in any case. They don’t believe in this particular part of Islam but ordinary Sunnis practice Misyaar which is the other name of Muta’ah in Sunni Islam. Wahabis don’t even believe in Misyar which is permissible in Sunni school of thought. It is really provocative act on behalf of you to conclude things about Mut’ah without studying about it. What makes you call it Mutah? Wahabis are simply showing their extreme hatred and prejudice for moderate sunnis, shias or syrians by sending mercenaries to Syria and other parts of the world. They decreed those brainwashed morons to have sexual intercourse with women and legitimized it by connecting it with Islam which is totally wrong. Whatever you call it, Sex, Rape or in their laws a legitimate act, but it is not Muta’ah.
Let me tell you a little bit about Mut’ah which is called Misyaar in sunni school of thought.
Muta’ah is no different from Nikah(permanent marriage) but in one case and that is ‘time frame’. Both men and women are independent to set a time frame, not hours right ! and agree upon the Maher as in the permanent marriage. Woman have equal right to propose a man. A widow can decide on her own part but in case of an unmarried girl her father’s permission is needed. It is marriage with a single difference in time frame.
It was just a little introduction of Mut’ah. Please! Before writing something do your homework. Don’t relate Mut’ah with those moron Wahabis. They are just exhibiting their extreme hatred and frustration. If Muta’ah was broadly in practice then we would not see rapes, frustration in both men and women, the curse of dowry and the divorce.
Finally I regret to say that your article is so immature in terms of research. Because you even don’t know that in Wahabism, Muta’h is not permissible so please don’t use the term ‘Muta’ah’ in this respect. You’re free to express your views with some appropriate terminologies.
Hope you will approve my comment. If not then I will remember you as a coward and unrealistic writer.
“@Taslima: I have no objection over your article but you need to study before writing. Why are you relating Muta’ah with Wahabis. I need the answer because you’ve misused this term here. Wahabi’s don’t believe in Muta’ah. They only believe in rape and murder. Muta’ah is part of Shia Islam and it’a as legitimate as permanent marriage. The difference is only in time frame but the whole process is same is traditional permanent marriage. You must clarify it because it offends Shias and not wahabis.
Waiting for your reply”
Finally I got her reply which was even more childish and violent. She used abusive language which I’ve omitted and posted what is presentable. Here you go…
“Read my article again and again and again and again. Did I relate Mut’ah with Wahabis? No. I relate Mut’ah with Islam. I mock Islam for having Mut’ah. I criticize Saudi Arabia for not having a minimum age for marriage. Got it?”
Here goes my counter comment.
“Having a hair cut or wearing some brand doesn’t make you civilized. Your language EXPLAINS your personality. If you don’t believe in Muta’ah then you must not believe in permanent marriage too. What is the difference between temporary and permanent marriage? Only time frame?
What do you know about Muta’ah and how much you have tried to study and know about it?“
It’s unfortunate that people like this moron hear some news and try to fill up their blog with unverified material which leads some readers to misunderstandings and wrong perceptions. I strongly recommend the readers to study about Muta’ah(Not from Internet) completely and then build an opinion.